Research Paper 1526.0
Loading preview...
Page 1 of --

Research Paper Details

Microstructural studies of composite Mughal period cannons of Daulatabad Fort, India, by electron backscattered diffraction and scanning electron microscopy

Royal Mughal No ARC-03112021-1002
Author Rajdeo Singh
Language English
Era Babur 1526–1530

Paper Information

Subject Military Science
Subclass Artillery (Military Science)
Year 1526.0
Contributed By Rajdeo Singh
Related Keyword canon
Date of Creation 2021-11-02T20:00:00Z

Description

Historical data on ancient Indian cannons have systematically been researched, but there is lack of archaeometallurgical studies on bimetallic can- nons. This study revolves around 16th–17th century bimetallic Indian cannons: copper barrel with inner iron sleeve at an approximate ratio of 5:1. Scanning electron microscopy and electron backscattered diffraction techniques have been employed to know the changes in the microstructures of the metals used in making cannons. Energy dispersive spectrometry confirmed that the outer copper barrel, with 4.5 wt% tin, had inclusions of cupric oxide (Cu2O) and contained lead and sulfur. The inner sleeve, on the other hand, was primarily iron but contained fayalite (FeSiO4) and inclusions with silicon and phospho- rous. Both inner (bloomery iron) and outer (copper) material had strong signa- tures of plastic deformation, and the cannons were stipulated to be forge welded. Deformation twinning in recrystallized iron grains of inner iron sleeve and near‐perfect extensive twinning in the inner copper barrel indicate exposures of the respective materials to such active usage. It is concluded from the deformed structures and from the presence of clear joints that the bimetal- lic cannons were made by a process of forge welding. This study brings actual manufacturing practices of bimetallic cannons in ancient India.

Reviews
Microstructural studies of composite Mughal period cannons of Daulatabad Fort, India, by electron backscattered diffraction and scanning electron microscopy
  • No reviews yet.